Wealth Wednesdays: Moving a Team: Agree on the Destination Before Choosing a Firm (Part 2)

A team can agree that it is time to explore a move without agreeing on where to go. The lead advisor may want more independence.

Wealth Wednesdays | September 2026 edition | For advisors and financial planners

Archive edition prepared and reviewed October 21, 2026.

A team can agree that it is time to explore a move without agreeing on where to go. The lead advisor may want more independence. A planner may want stronger resources. A client service colleague may be thinking about what daily work would look like. Those differences deserve a conversation before the team starts evaluating firms.

Those perspectives belong in the conversation before the team begins evaluating firms.

Establish shared priorities

Describe what the group wants to preserve and what it wants to improve. Client experience, autonomy, planning support, compensation and professional development may matter differently to each person. Identify the conditions that are essential to the team as a whole.

That discussion can also reveal where more information is needed. A platform move should not be expected to solve every internal responsibility question the team has not yet addressed.

Evaluate the operating experience

Ask a prospective firm how the team would work within its model. Clarify who supplies support, how responsibilities would be allocated and which resources are included. Find out what changes would affect each member's normal day.

Bring a shared set of questions:

  • Can the team retain the collaboration that works well today?
  • What would change in client service and planning workflows?
  • How would each person's role and progression be defined?
  • Who would coordinate the transition and onboarding work?
  • Which assumptions require written confirmation or professional advice?

Preserve individual decisions

People and clients make their own choices. A team should avoid treating an expected transition as a guaranteed group outcome or sharing confidential information prematurely. Legal restrictions and obligations require qualified advice.

A confidential discussion with Ramax can help the group define the kind of firm or platform it wants to explore. Starting with a clear brief gives the team a more useful way to compare possibilities than reacting to the first attractive proposal.

Considering your next role, firm or platform? Ramax welcomes confidential conversations with wealth advisors, wealth managers and CFP professionals nationwide. An inquiry does not imply that a matching position is currently available. Explore your options confidentially.

Agree on the tradeoffs within the team

The platform that appeals most to a lead advisor may not address the priorities of the planner or client service colleague working alongside them. Before evaluating firms, give each person an opportunity to describe what is working, what needs improvement and which responsibilities they hope to retain or develop.

Look for points of agreement and differences that need discussion. A team may share a desire for stronger support while disagreeing about how much independence it wants. Some members may welcome centralized resources; others may value direct ownership of particular tasks. Identifying those preferences early helps the group ask more specific questions of a prospective firm.

From Ramax’s perspective, the destination needs to make sense for the people doing the work. A team can look strong as a group and still have different needs within it. I would rather understand those differences at the beginning than have them surface after everyone has become attached to a particular firm.

by Peter Tannenbaum

Peter Tannenbaum founded Ramax Search & Staffing in 1991. He leads a boutique recruiting firm focused on U.S. financial services, working with employers and professionals across investment management, banking, wealth management and related businesses. His articles explore hiring, compensation and career decisions. Learn more about Peter and Ramax.